Home > Aiglx Error > Aiglx Error Drmmap Of Framebuffer Failed

Aiglx Error Drmmap Of Framebuffer Failed

Brice Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian X Strike Force : Bug#488283; Package libgl1-mesa-glx. (Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:51:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. Message #50 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Brice Goglin To: Sten Heinze , [email protected] Cc: Julien Cristau <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Bug#488283: software rendering Date: Tue, 28 Oct Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support Hardware [ubuntu] no DRI, software OpenGL with Intel That probably explains the white screen. http://bsnux.com/aiglx-error/aiglx-error-drmmap-of-framebuffer-failed-invalid-argument.html

Copy sent to Debian X Strike Force . (Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. Allocating room for a 2048x2048 virtual screen requires a lot of available memory. glx/glxdri.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/glx/glxdri.c b/glx/glxdri.c index 6122653..cbbf240 100644 --- a/glx/glxdri.c +++ b/glx/glxdri.c @@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ __glXDRIscreenProbe(ScreenPtr pScreen) if (!DRIOpenConnection(pScreen, &hSAREA, Hi Julien, But shouldn't the driver be able to allocate and handle memory up to 2048x2048? http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=34770

kinda. Maciek Previous message: Problem with intel driver on laptop with 945GM chipset Next message: vt switching via xtest not working in xorg-server 1.4.0.90 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread Results 1 to 2 of 2 Thread: no DRI, software OpenGL with Intel 945 in 9.04 jaunty Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Sten Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian X Strike Force : Bug#488283; Package libgl1-mesa-glx.

Copy sent to Debian X Strike Force . However, I still do obtain the message "libGL error: drmMap of framebuffer failed (Invalid argument) .." when launching "glxinfo", whereas the modules built from the "freedesktop.org" tree work correctly [The next That probably explains the white screen. >> > I don't expect KDE to work with 3d effects, but I expect it to fallback to > normal operation without 3d effects. When I had installed "FC5", the fps of "glxgears" for both "Xorg 7.0" and "Xorg 7.2 RC3" was about 190.

Cheers, Julien Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian X Strike Force : Bug#488283; Package libgl1-mesa-glx. (Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:51:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. Full text and rfc822 format available. This explains why indirect rendering is used instead. Also I set the severity to important, but a higher is probably more suitable since it makes other packages almost unusable.

Acknowledgement sent to Sten Heinze : Extra info received and forwarded to list. And it does this correctly if I e.g. It looks like they are "oustanding" enough to break "DRI", so they are apparently not that trivial. Sten Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian X Strike Force : Bug#488283; Package libgl1-mesa-glx.

Full text and rfc822 format available. Can you send me a Xorg.0.log from the old and new modules? Sten [Xorg.0.log.2048 (text/x-java, attachment)] [Xorg.0.log.1820 (text/x-java, attachment)] [xorg.conf (text/plain, attachment)] Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian X Strike Force : Bug#488283; Package libgl1-mesa-glx. (Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:45:02 GMT) Full text and If you set Virtual to 1400x2074, you get the above cryptic message...

This is using a Thinkpad X40 with Intel 855GM graphics card: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) I am not sure if this is correct check over here Message #77 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Julien Cristau <[email protected]> To: Sten Heinze Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Bug#488283: libgl1-mesa-glx: drmMap of framebuffer failed, reverting to software rendering I installed debian's linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 from testing, and compiled vanilla 2.6.25.10 (+patches for tp-smapi, hdaps, linux-phc), but the error message still remains the same. I'm not really sure what could be causing this, make sure you rmmod the kernel drm and savage ones before installing the git tree ones with debug=1 passed to drm..

Acknowledgement sent to Sten Heinze : Extra info received and forwarded to list. Acknowledgement sent to Sten Heinze : Extra info received and forwarded to list. Alan. his comment is here Full text and rfc822 format available.

How does this sound to others. Comment 23 Dave Airlie 2007-02-17 22:20:51 UTC Okay I've added some changes to the drm-2.6 git tree to see if they fix this problem.. Building "drm.ko" and "savage.ko" from the "freedesktop.org" development tree works again after some recent breakage, and the resulting modules restore working hardware rendering.

Steps to reproduce: 1.

URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Message #45 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Sten Heinze To: Julien Cristau <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Bug#488283: software rendering Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:47:29 +0100 Comment 20 Joachim Frieben 2007-02-08 05:15:09 UTC Created attachment 10342 [details] Output of "dmesg" for 2.6.20-1.2922.fc7 stock kernel "DRM" modules with "modprobe drm debug=1" The section below the last entry [drm:drm_stub_open] Message #60 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Brice Goglin To: Sten Heinze , [email protected] Subject: Re: Bug#488283: software rendering Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:21:44 +0100 Sten

According to [1] on > system with more than 256MB of ram (i have more) 64MB should be allocated to > the graphics card. Even switching desktops needs up to several seconds. > Looking into Xorg.0.log I found: > > (EE) AIGLX error: drmMap of framebuffer failed (Invalid argument)(EE) > AIGLX: reverting to software rendering By merely looking at the handful of "savage" related source files, it becomes clear that there actually -are- differences between the "2.6.20rc7" kernel "DRM" and the one from the "git" tree. weblink It is slow whatever I use, EXA, XAA, or other options.

Log in to "X" session and execute "glxinfo". Ubuntu Logo, Ubuntu and Canonical Canonical Ltd. I didn't have this problem with .4, and I don't see anything in the kernel changelogs causing that. Allocating room for a 2048x2048 virtual screen > requires a lot of available memory.

I think we should close this as not a bug. >> > > But shouldn't the driver be able to allocate and handle memory up to > 2048x2048? > Handle yes, Both Xorg.0.log.* (2048=before, 1820=after) attached, as well as my xorg.conf.