Home > Ads Error > Ads Error 7057

Ads Error 7057

If you can post an example of the table in the state where an INSERT will cause that problem, it might help show what the issue is. Forums Archive > Advantage DB > StreamlineSQL > "7057 error" 7057 error 3 posts in StreamlineSQL . If this is a one time occurrence, the quickest method to get back up and running is to remove the first entry or set of entries if using transactions from the Otherwise I will have a mission critical application out of service because of corrupt data I cannot find.

Essentially a partial key could have been written to the index, but because this 3rd party program had locked portions of the file ADS was not able to undo the work. The Corporate Office has a Static IP and the replication is done to that IP. We have Win 2008 Server at Branch and Corporate Office All the Tables has a field UUID. Home / Contact Us / Help / Jobs / Legal / Privacy / Code of Ethics Follow Advantage × Sybase NNTP forums - End Of Life (EOL) The NNTP forums http://devzone.advantagedatabase.com/dz/Content.aspx?Key=17&RefNo=061115-1828

Forums Archive > Advantage DB > Replication > "7057 in Replication - ADS_ERR.zip (0/1)" 7057 in Replication - ADS_ERR.zip (0/1) 5 posts in Replication . There is nothing in the error log on the receiving end. Ltd.Reply-To: [email protected]: References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-asciiContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitNNTP-Posting-Host: 122.172.122.232X-Trace: 30 Jun 2010 02:08:46 -0700, 122.172.122.232Lines: 45Path: solutions.advantagedatabase.com!122.172.122.232Xref: solutions.advantagedatabase.com Advantage.Replication:401 Article PK: 1134254 Edgar, We are I open the tables using MACHINE_VFP_BIN_1252 and you can see from my previous post that VFP is using "Machine" for collation.

The key value supplied for Customer:PRIMARY is not unique. And we are not updating this field. Should I open the table with >> "MACHINE_VFP_BIN_1252" as the value for the useCharType? But the pending record?s ?UpdateType?

Details... The table is on the same drive >> as ADS so no network is involved and I am using ADS 9.0. >> >> Thanks, >> Simon > © Copyright Fri Sep But when this record reaches at the target, it shows the error.. over here Is this a problem in ARC, or something that I might continue to > see in my application? > > © Copyright Fri Sep 30 03:23:06 UTC 2016, SAP Inc. -

I've never encountered it. > >OTOH: you're setting it a default value and so there's still a chance >to overwrite it from the client application or any SQL statement and >the NULL), then all rows with EntryID less than or equal to this TxnReady value are part of the transaction and should all be removed. The pertinent pieces of information would be the file and > line number entries from the log (and the exact ADS_VER field value). > > Mark Wilkins > Advantage R&D > The 7017 error is, unfortunately, overused and is generated by quite a few different errors (all related to index corruption).

I thought with Insert and Update turn on this should not be possible. http://nntp-archive.sybase.com/nntp-archive/action/article/%3C461b31b3[email protected]%3E All new questions should be directed to the appropriate forum at the SAP Community Network (SCN). Thanks in advance. When I open a table I use: >> >> AdsOpenTable(*toApp\Connect\Handle,*Table\Table,*Table\Alias, >> #ADS_VFP,#MACHINE_VFP_BIN_1252,#ADS_COMPATIBLE_LOCKING, >> #ADS_IGNORERIGHTS,*Table\Useage,@*Table\Connect\Handle) >> >> and when I create an SQL Statement I issue the following three >> statements: >>

If you can > post the error log entries (from ads_err.*) that have an instance of the > 7017 error, it might help us identify more specifically the nature of > Thanks, Simon On 03/05/2011 1:48 PM, Mark Wilkins wrote: > It sounds to me like there is still a mismatch in the collations. The table is on the same drive >>> as ADS so no network is involved and I am using ADS 9.0. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Simon >> > Joachim Duerr (ADS) But it >> is probably due to the likelihood of it using a different collation.

When I look at the same record at the receiving end they have identical GUID. When I open a table I use: AdsOpenTable(*toApp\Connect\Handle,*Table\Table,*Table\Alias, #ADS_VFP,#MACHINE_VFP_BIN_1252,#ADS_COMPATIBLE_LOCKING, #ADS_IGNORERIGHTS,*Table\Useage,@*Table\Connect\Handle) and when I create an SQL Statement I issue the following three statements: AdsStmtSetTableType(*Table\Connect\HandleSQL,#ADS_VFP) AdsStmtSetTableLockType(*Table\Connect\HandleSQL, #ADS_COMPATIBLE_LOCKING) AdsStmtSetTableCharType(*Table\Connect\HandleSQL,#MACHINE_VFP_BIN_1252) The code is written I am using the following SQL statement: INSERT INTO BPTRN (ACCOUNT,AcctNo,Bulk,CardNo1,[Date],Dept, [Desc],Disc,FuelType,GSTInPrice,Host,ID,Manual,Misc,NoExport, NoInvoice,Odometer,Owner,PID,PmpNo,Price,Product,Qty,Site,Term, Thru,Time,Total,TrnNo,_Updated,_UpdatedBy) VALUES (' ',' ',0,'782448300000013004','20110426',' ','08-01 ',0.0000,'01',1,0,'BJTnxg3sB',0,'',0,0,'65', 'YOURACCNT','2L50P1RVQ','01',1.000,'1I80T603D',17.000,'34A0TT4IU', 'I',0.0000,'13:26',17.00,'0534','20110426122157','dCKardLive') I get the following error: Error 7200: AQE Error: Should I open the table with > "MACHINE_VFP_BIN_1252" as the value for the useCharType?

For example, if you are using the API directly > for SQL statements, then you need to make this call when creating an SQL > statement: > > ret = AdsStmtSetTableType( It is missing about 40 records. First time here?

Was This Item Helpful?

The table is on the same drive as ADS so no network is involved and I am using ADS 9.0. The strange thing is that I was using it >>> for the past month without any errors. The TxnReady column of the first entry indicates whether the update is part of the transaction. will newidString("D") create a non unique >>>>id ? >>> >>>the chance to get a duplicate value on a GUID is really small, but it >>>still exists.

Error_Number DateTime Thread_Num Err_Class Error_Code ADS_Source Src_Line Cnnct_Num Cnnct_Name FileName ADS_Ver Environmnt OS_Version HostName More_Info Application_ID 20 04/26/2011 11:54:39 AM 5736 1012 7017 cidx.c 3842 10.0.0.3 Local Server 5.2 DW17 When Error 7200: AQE Error: State = HY000; NativeError = 7057; [iAnywhere Solutions][Advantage SQL][ASA] Error 7057: The record update failed. The VFP table is set to Collate = Machine and the adslocal.cfg has: ANSI_CHAR_SET= OEM_CHAR_SET=USA Simon On 01/04/2011 10:44 AM, Mark Wilkins wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Do you get Mark Wilkins Advantage R&D Simon White Posted on 2011-05-05 01:31:24.0Z Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:31:24 -0400From: Simon White User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10MIME-Version: 1.0Newsgroups:

It appears that the replication of the record was successful at the target, however due to the network failure the source did not receive the success signal to remove the record When we check ADS_ERR.ADT we can find 7057 error Sample Error 7200: AQE Error: State = HY000; NativeError = 7057; [iAnywhere Solutions][Advantage SQL][ASA] Error 7057: The record update failed. ADS 10.10.0.49 Update with support for Delphi XE4. The strange thing is that I was using it for the past month without any errors.

For ADT table, the index > expression should use the ; operator instead of the + operator, as the > following:> YEARMONTH;STR(KODSCHET,11);STR(KODKLI,11)> > With the + operator, any null value in All the Branches has (ADS 9.10.0.9 (32 Bit) running on Windows 2008 Server (64 Bit) Standard Edition The Replication from one Branch is over the LAN since it is in the That >> means there can be an error in the replication. >> >> Regards >> Kiron >> >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:01:00 +0200, "Joachim Duerr (ADS)" >> <[email protected]> wrote: The key value produced from this record was not unique, and an index for the current table has the UNIQUE property.

Forums Archive > Advantage DB > StreamlineSQL > "Error running SQL every other time" Error running SQL every other time 2 posts in StreamlineSQL . The pertinent pieces of information would be the file and line number entries from the log (and the exact ADS_VER field value). I have it set >>> as ADS_OEM currently and would like to know if this is a mistake that >>> could contribute to the errors I am seeing. >>> >>> Thanks, If you can post the error log entries (from ads_err.*) that have an instance of the 7017 error, it might help us identify more specifically the nature of the error.

If you post a few lines from ads_err.adt or ads_err.dbf related to the > 7057 error, we may be able to tell what is causing it.Unfortunately I have nothing about this As long as the return value of those calls is zero (AE_SUCCESS), then it should be okay. Its default value set as >NewIDString("D"). Still having the same problem it only happens on update.

If I understand correctly, you are updating the table both with VFP and Advantage (or at least building the index with VFP and then using it with Advantage). Kiron Joseph Posted on 2010-06-30 08:11:33.0Z From: Kiron Joseph Newsgroups: Advantage.ReplicationSubject: Re: 7057 in Replication - ADS_ERR.zip (0/1)Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:41:33 +0530Organization: Data Devices Pvt. Currently all my tables where created in VFP 9.0 and the index collation in VFP shows "Machine".